Roger's Re-think: PLOVER - Religion - Philosophical viewpoints

© Roger M Tagg 2009-2011

Highlights of book: The Icon in my Pocket  by Owe Wikström, St Pauls 2004 (English translation by Yvonne King 2008), ISBN 978-1-921472-00-8

Introduction

The idea of this book, reflection on why we travel and go on holidays, seems excellent. But I felt disappointed that, in the end, all the author seemed to want to do was to advocate a sort of mysticism as something we all need. Well, I for one don't feel that need, and am perfectly happy about feeling that way.

The "icon" in question does not refer to anything on a computer, but to the sort of picture one sees in an Orthodox church.

All the same, I found quite a lot of value in the author's reflection, as long as I ignored his main thrust!

ChapterPage

  Highlight

Part 1 -
 The outward
journey
1-40Why do we go on holidays? For relaxation, change, a search for "something more"? Commercially, it's very idealized, hyped up "holiday of a lifetime". We set great store on photos, souvenirs, stories to dine out on. But it's difficult to just switch off from the flat out daily grind, and some people don't escape the phone or email. The many forms include package holidays (seaside, activity and sightseeing); backpacking, gap years, bumming around, pilgrimages. But half the world aren't in on this - many have to serve us.
 39Experience-oriented individualization is growing, while interest in party politics and societies is waning.
 41Some travellers are romantic idealists, remainders of a disillusioned group of survivors from 1968.
 45A journey can be a pause for reflection about our life; we may collect things to provide for later nostalgia.
 60Some people may have a guilty conscience about having a good time.
 63There is in some cultures a habit of "averted gaze" - not looking other people directly in the face (e.g. Japan, Sweden) - but is this significant? [RT: like English circumlocution?]
 66Some people experience melancholy in private communion with nature.
 67Another cultural habit is conflict avoidance (e.g. Swedes) - "let's not argue".
 76-7After the decline of theocracy, 'ism-ocracy' was a disaster; even psychoanalysis didn't give any answers for the reality of suffering.
 79We may well ask "why does evil so often triumph?"
Part 2 -
The inner
80 onThe author takes us on 3 trips, to Paris, Rome and Venice, but really just as a background for stories of people he saw or met, and mainly just to push his view that what we really need is more mysticism.
journey83We feel the need to re-evaluate our lives at some times more than at other times.
 84He pushes the idea that we all experience a troubled heart and "homelessness". [RT: but do we all? I don't think I do that much, even after having made my home in 4 different countries.]
 85He likens the "inner journey" to a pilgrimage, advocating "death of self" and "surrender". But is this the only, or even best, path?
 86Reaching out to others - [RT: this might be a better line, but not "forgetting oneself", surely. If one reaches out to others too much, one may risk becoming a busybody and a pain to others who don't want you intruding.]
 91Seneca: you must know who you are, and where you are heading. [RT: this doesn't seem to tally with "surrender"].
 93Only those who have an identity can forget themselves for the sake of others.
 101A true friend isn't obsequious, but helps us to develop our own authentic individuality.
 111aCharacter building is good. [RT: OK, but what about the many people who can't "hack it"?]
 111bSeneca's view of academics: "such people whose time is taken up by studying and publishing worthless Knowledge ... they have achieved nothing of any use." [RT: I often agree, but I suppose they are driven by the reward system: "publish or perish, get PhD completions".]
 112"Only he who swims against the tide reaches the source."
 120Culture vultures: they are a bit like external tourists. It's not too different from snobbishness, and putting others down.
 121It's better if we are seeking nourishment for ourselves.
 128Art opens up passageways into the real world (Proust). But the "other world" is never distinctly described (no faith, church, religion).
 131Montaigne - the polite, chivalrous or courteous gesture costs virtually nothing and gives out a lot.
 133Beauty can activate homelessness.
 155Religious places and icons are not symbolic, they are "performative", i.e. they create something. He says "they look at you" - [RT: like Kitchener's WW1 poster?]. Do they "illustrate a paradox"?
 160Many long for a world that is not cold or indifferent [RT: and many don't].
 169His summary: there are 3 stages on the internal journey: 1) recognition of where one is, friendship and integrity; 2) active searching via aesthetics; 3) ethics and spirituality: meeting with the glance of "the other".
 175He admits he hasn't advanced many rational arguments. But he says he has a sort of reliance on "the other's" gaze.
RT reflection Early on I thought that this book was going to be better than it turned out in the end. He seems to just present a sort of mysticism as the answer to life's problems, facilitated by looking at icons. This doesn't help much if the reader doesn't feel this need, or the call of an icon. Certainly, he is not taking the biblical, evangelical line, nor the "mother church will do your thinking" line. However he quickly dismisses any other approach but Christianity - he is just so sure he is right. I suppose it is a sort of mega sermon, applying Kirkegaard's general drift to the phenomenon of making holiday journeys.

Links

Back to Book Highlights index Back to Re-think home Back to tagg.org

The links below lead to the other components of  PLOVER

Philosophy Language Ontology Value Evolution Religion

Some of these links may be under construction – or re-construction.

This version updated on 17th January 2011